Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservativegreatgrandma; ez; dirtboy
Ah, but now we are talking tactical voting. That adds another dimension to the argument.

? Suppose I prefer candidate A to candidate B. Then I should vote for A, obviously. But suppose I realise that candidate B is more likely than candidate A to defeat comrade O? Then the question could become not whether I think candidate A is better than candidate B, but does my support for candidate A exceed my hatred for comrade O?

Lets put it more personally. A lot of folk on here prefer Newt Gingrich over Herman Cain. Gingrich is smart, he's got a better campaign team than Cain and he certainly has a lot more practical political experience. HOWEVER, Cain might very well be a better candidate to put against Obama.

86 posted on 11/25/2011 6:06:23 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Vanders9

You got it and these are the questions with which we all must wrestle.


91 posted on 11/25/2011 6:10:30 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson