All you are doing is accepting Newt's word that he is serious about border security as he simultaneously shills for amnesty and a guest worker program. Shall we look at the history of those inside the Beltway who have done such?
Simpson-Mazzoli was supposed to secure the borders after amnesty and it didn't.
We were supposed to build a thousand miles of border fence. RINOs such as KBH blocked most of the construction.
McCain added secure the borders first to his call for amnesty. And hasn't done squat to facilitate border security.
Both Obama and Napolitano have declared the border to now be secure when it is not.
Yet you would have us believe that a consummate Beltway insider such as Newt is vastly different from his brethern, and we can trust him this time around. Yeah, sure...
So I am the one looking at the long and sordid history of amnesty pimps in this country and their rank insincerity about securing the border. I am the one actually thinking and evaluating history. You, to the contrary, are in campaign shill mode, which means you will attack anyone who questions the veracity of your candidate.
Bite, zombie, bite.
No, I fully expect Newt not to do what I would want him to on immigration. I believe in securing the border with troops, penalizing buisnesses who hire illegals, deporting any illegals who are detected, and no citizenship EVER for a person who entered illegally. Newt will not cater to my ideas on immigration and I would fully expect him to do what Reagan did.
BUT LOOKING AT THE BIG PICTURE (emphasis added) I think Newt is the best person in the field of eight to run America. In fact, after Newt I would have a hard time picking a “big picture” candidate because they are all so far behind him in intellect and knowledge.
Now lets have a look at your BIG JUICY BRAIN!!!