My statement was a hypothetical response to a poster's question of what could possibly cause a respected scientist to get sucked in by something that was questionable; it isn't a judgement on Rossi specifically.
I hope he's right; but there are some things he does which make me wonder. For example, recently he trumpeted the fact that National Instruments had agreed to work with him instrumenting the E-Cat. Well, my first thought was that NI will sell DAC boards to anyone--it seemed like a self-promotional announcement. Things like that make you wonder--but that's not the same as being there and able to form a definite opinion one way or the other.
Well worth reading if you believe anything that is.
I especially like the part where he puts Edison, Tesla and Einstein on his front page like he is the next in line.
My statement was a hypothetical response to a poster’s question of what could possibly cause a respected scientist to get sucked in by something that was questionable;
***Then you have discovered where your parallel does not break down. Steven Chu got drawn into the Solyndra thing because the scientific results were significant. So did Kullander.