Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: julieee

And a wicked, immoral, unconstitutional pledge that is.

It includes a promise to sign “fetal pain” legislation, which bases whether or not to protect a child based on pain, not personhood, as the Constitution of the United States, and the constitutions of all the States, explicitly and imperatively require.

I will not support any candidate for any office who has signed this pledge. It is a gross breach of the sacred oath of office.


52 posted on 11/22/2011 10:44:21 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Newt Gingrich: The go to guy when you're down to the bottom of the bottom of the barrel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

I agree that fetal pain legislation is not a substitute for other pro-life legislation, but I fail to see why it is a bad thing to have a law that says you can’t inflict pain on the unborn.

I support fetal pain legislation as an incrementally better thing than what we have today, while we work toward the goal.


93 posted on 11/22/2011 11:44:54 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson