>> “If you have a convincing demo with numbers that make sense and work, present that. Don’t present nonsense that doesn’t add up and then spend your energy explaining where the “real” data is” <<
.
You’re asking to be spoon-fed; it isn’t going to happen, because your opinion, or reaction is of no concern to the researcher. Someone else may well be getting fed the reduced data, but not us.
Dear me. I have been nothing but polite for two days now and have encountered nothing but derision and scorn from the proponents of this technology. My requirements for proof are laid out completely and clearly in post 20 and they are not unreasonable. If you think they are maybe we should discuss this before proceeding. I do note that the data provided does not meet the standards of #20 but it may be teased out of what is provided. Because of the obvious acrimony I have to do the calculations anyway but surely welcome anyone who wants to compute along. This, BTW, is graduate drudge work.