The POINT was that these postings have almost NO scientific discussion. Any attempt to do so invariably launches an avalanche of irrelevant non-science garbage.
"I do hope that you have finally acknowledged and personally come to terms with the fact that your guy Rossi is pushing fraudulent academic credentials."
First, Rossi is not "my guy". My sole purpose is to get to the truth of the SCIENTIFIC aspects of the question. At no point have I ever denied that Rossi had PARTIALLY fraudulent credentials. I simply consider that IRRELEVANT to getting to the bottom of the scientific question.
"As long as you agree that this is the case, I suppose I could see fit to stop beating the fake degree drum...
Gee, how gracious of you. You finally see that the horse is dead.
Seems like you still don’t get it. What do you mean by, “PARTIALLY fraudulent credentials?” Do you dispute that Kensington U. was a diploma mill? Do you dispute that Rossi, to this very day, states that his engineering degree was granted by Kensington U.? Which part of this do you dispute?