Got no problem at all with "legitimate, critical scientific discussion". But I "do" have a problem with someone who wants to REQUIRE me to re-calculate, re-format, and re-peat the information before he/she will "deign" to bless it with the caress of his/her baby blues. I'm neither his/her (nor your) student or employee.
You should actually TRY posting some "legitimate, critical, scientific discussion".....you might be surprised at the response.
But continuously repeating "it's a scam", "Rossi is a crook", "Rossi has a fake degree" is NOT "legitimate, critical SCIENTIFIC discussion".
Pointing out that Rossi has a scam degree is indeed legitimate and critical discussion, if not directly scientific. I do hope that you have finally acknowledged and personally come to terms with the fact that your guy Rossi is pushing fraudulent academic credentials. As long as you agree that this is the case, I suppose I could see fit to stop beating the fake degree drum...