And I still recommend it to skeptics. I believe that material is a fair an honest presentation by the author. It contains all of the information I thought I needed plus a wealth of observation and some pretty cool pictures. The analysis of possible fake energy sources looks to first order to be pretty complete. On the whole the document looks like a pretty competent effort by somebody trying to be objective. He does gush a bit to much in places to be taken seriously by some but the material is exciting if true so a little gush can be forgiven.
I have thoughts about the technical content. I'd like to ask you some questions about it after I sleep on it. I realize that you are not the source of the information, just the conduit. But you appear to be a rational and well informed conduit and I promise to try to ask interesting questions. Again, thanks for the pointer.
The author is a freeper. But he doesn’t seem to post much.