Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

I think that what we’re going to see is that the process isn’t sufficiently energetic to justify the waste of the nickle on large scale operations.
***That’s an interesting perspective. Do you have a COP cutoff point that you consider to be “sufficiently energetic”? Would it mean you think this is a chemical reaction?


132 posted on 11/15/2011 10:51:23 PM PST by Kevmo (When a thing is owned by everybody nobody gives value to it. Communism taught us this. ~A. Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo

>> “Would it mean you think this is a chemical reaction?” <<

.
Definitely not.

Chemical reactions do not produce new elements. It just means that producing copper is not a very energetic fusion reaction. Of course, other elements were also produced. This needs some serious investment into research to find out exactly what is happening.


159 posted on 11/16/2011 2:02:07 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson