Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

Having given the example of a defensive weapon ~ a 16 ft high chain link fence, why are they restricted in urban areas.

The second amendment is all about the right of self-defense. Certainly defensive fortifications should not be objected to, right?


I don,t think a fence would be against the constitution, but i do believe that our society which is fast becoming a socialist society is the problem instead of the lack of a fence, we need to stop the socialism and quit making the working people take care of the ones who would rather live on government than take care of themselves, there is a lot more to it than that but it is the problem.


244 posted on 11/14/2011 7:19:43 AM PST by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofsre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: ravenwolf
I don't think burglars and thieves care one way or the other about ideology ~ they just want your stuff.

Hence, the need for a protective Fence, is just as Constitutional s the need for door locks.

But, we digress, a 16 ft high chainlink fence around your property in a residentially zoned area of a city is usually prohibited. So why is that?

246 posted on 11/14/2011 10:36:23 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson