Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Not that I'm suprised, but this is a little confusing. The last couple of days it was reported that the IAEA report would lay out plenty of circumstantial evidence that Iran was working towards a nuclear weapon, without directly coming to that conclusion. Now, a source from within the IAEA is saying that the report does indeed come to that very conclusion. Looks like ElBaradei was running interference for the Iranians during his tenure as head of the IAEA.
1 posted on 11/08/2011 10:27:08 AM PST by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MississippiMan; ctdonath2; LibertyRocks; GonzoGOP; b4its2late; bert; maquiladora; hennie pennie; ...

ping


2 posted on 11/08/2011 10:28:10 AM PST by jhpigott (North Korea - The land of lousy options)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott
Impossible, I have been assured by Ron Paul supporters that Iran in a primitive backwater and is no where near a nuke...

Next you'll tell me they have orbited a satellite or something...

4 posted on 11/08/2011 10:35:10 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott

IAEA suddenly beating the war drum. We’ll be fighting the Iranians alongside the Islamist Turks in six months and Israel will be attacked in the crossfire. Here comes Ottoman Empire II. Iran was a red herring all along.


5 posted on 11/08/2011 10:35:34 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott

So the Iranian nuke effort started immediately after the Iraqi nuclear program went missing. Coincidence?


6 posted on 11/08/2011 10:51:57 AM PST by MeganC (Are you better off than you were four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott

Well, all I have to say to the IAEA is: No Sh**, Sherlock.

Of course, El Baradai was covering for the Iranians. I don’t care if people think I’m a bigot, but we should never entrust a Muslim with preventing proliferation of weapons. That is like trusting hiring an ex-con prison guard and expecting him not to smuggle contraband.


9 posted on 11/08/2011 2:02:33 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jhpigott
Just FOUR years ago (12/03/2007), the MSM was TRUMPETING a new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that DECLARED with "HIGH CONFIDENCE" that Iran's military nuclear efforts STOPPED in 2003 and had not resumed.

As you can imagine, such reliable sources as the New York Times made ample use of this declaration to beat the Bush'43 Administration bloody about its Middle East policy that centered upon weakening Iran. The fact that this report stated the following is almost mind boggling in its GROSS ERROR; But the new estimate declares with “high confidence” that a military-run Iranian program intended to transform that raw material into a nuclear weapon has been shut down since 2003, and also says with high confidence that the halt “was directed primarily in response to increasing international scrutiny and pressure.”

An interesting point to make here, I personally found this an unbelievable supposition when it came out but I was just a normal citizen so what did I know? Now we know that every appearance has this report as palpably FALSE, yet have any of the authors of this NIE been reassigned or maybe fired? Could it be that they saw the political winds of 2006-2008 and chose their opinions on who their new masters would be in 2009? Surely, I must be mistaken! /sarc

10 posted on 11/08/2011 3:14:38 PM PST by SES1066 (Vote in 2012 for OUR CIVIL RIGHTS not the Left's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson