I don’t think anyone read my piece, because no one mentions the content. You didn’t either, but you seemed like a serious poster, so I responded.
My point was that there is a pattern of behavior of arrogance and recklessness. The sex scandal is the logical conclusion. It’s well supported. Nuff said.
Of course I read your piece.
I understand your point. But you still ignore the fact that you have zero evidence for your conclusion.
That’s fine. Just be honest and say it’s your gut talking.
And, yes, talking guts are also protected by the First Amendment.
The sex scandal is the logical conclusion. It’s well supported. Nuff said.
Tell that to the lawyer Bennett’s accuser client, who now says she *thinks* Cain is lying:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2801812/posts
But, hey, if that’s incontrovertible to you, then nuff said.