[hal ogen]

These women should return their money first and get agreement from whoever was on the other side before they go against the settlement. I thought a settlement was a settlement. I guess if you’re a lib then agreements mean nothing. Relativism rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[mylife]

The current story is that Mr Cain has broken the agreement, and apparently ticked off one of the women, who has now retained a lawyer.

Mr Cain has changed his tune over the course of several days on this matter, and while I am not accusing him, he appears vulnerable due to being reckless in his handling of the matter.

[mylife]

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/191245-attorney-says-cain-accuser-wants-to-speak-publicly-about-case

[novemberslady]

These women should return their money first and get agreement from whoever was on the other side before they go against the settlement. I thought a settlement was a settlement.

They need to have an opportunity to tell their side. If they had nothing to do with the leak, they should not have to re-pay the money.
Of course that's probably a legal argument deserving it's own thread.

I guess if you’re a lib then agreements mean nothing. Relativism rules!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So far I haven't seen anything saying that the women haven't kept their part of the agreement.

Imo, it's more conservative to allow the other side to explain themselves, and let people make up their own mind.