9-9-9 is a HUGE improvement over what we got now with regard to the federal tax situation. It's not how I would like to see it fixed but at least someone has stuck his neck out regarding fixing the problem.
I like, btw, what both Cain and Perry feel about the EPA. I like what they both think about social issues. I like what they think about energy.
These two are both so much better than what we were stuck with in 2008 my head spins.
A Freeper shouldn't rip either regardless of who he wants.
If somebody says something stupid in a debate or TV interview -- and that would be Herman -- just let it go.
Just say no to Romney.
I don’t care for 999-not in the least bit nor do I care for Mitt Romney. Neither Cain nor Romney is the best candidate IMO. I think Gingrich and Bachmann have repeatedly shown themselves to be the the superior candidates throughout all of these debates and if that means nothing, what was the point of even having these debates?
It has to be about JOBS this time around. Perry's first concrete proposal as a candidate has been about JOBS. Romney (puke) likewise. Although as Cain pointed out, Romney's 59 point plan is too cumbersome and difficult to absorb by the average republican voter.
I hope Perry successfully promotes his energy-jobs plan this Tuesday and beyond. It could be a game changer. Being a life-long Texan with a past in Oklahoma and California, I can tell you Perry's plan will send shockwaves of job growth across the landscape. I've watched these towns that were nothing turn into economic machines when exploration and drilling gets underway -- NUMEROUS times.
I'd encourage any of us to Google the current North Dakota economy and read about job creation as it relates to energy exploration. And just because one region may experience drilling and another may not, the jobs created take on tentacles to other areas where infrastructure and supply/manufacturing is readily available.