Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steve Jobs Was Not God
Gawker ^ | 10/7/2011 | Hamilton Nolan

Posted on 10/07/2011 1:30:39 PM PDT by toma29

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last
To: fabian

“Cancer is a disease of personality..deep buried anger that transforms some of the bodies cell into the demonic creatures minions which inhabit that body. That is why so much rage and sexuality in our society corresponds with huge numbers of deaths by cancer. It is not God’s judgment, but the devils...Be still exercise has helped cure many people.”

So I can have as evil a personality as I want so long as I stick to a fitness regimen? Good to know.


61 posted on 10/07/2011 2:13:24 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

No, I’m not flaming anyone, people are flaming me, all I did was post sources claiming it, it seems more likely than not. Decide for yourself.


62 posted on 10/07/2011 2:13:53 PM PDT by IamCenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: toma29

If your god is only materialism and amoral marxism, Jobs is a god of the “citizens of the world.”


63 posted on 10/07/2011 2:18:38 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamCenny

“Kaposi’s sarcoma of the pancreas possibly mimics pancreatic cancer in HIV-infected subjects.”

POSSIBLY MIMICS

He had pancreatic cancer, not AIDS. Work on your reading comprehension.


64 posted on 10/07/2011 2:22:11 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

I already gave him/her the award for stupidest post in the history of FR.


65 posted on 10/07/2011 2:25:52 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: toma29

There is nothing wrong with mourning a genius, the likes of which we will probably not see again in our lifetime. Screw the cynics at Gawker.


66 posted on 10/07/2011 2:33:33 PM PDT by CitizenReporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toma29

He is not God; he was, though, an icon.

He stood for a lot of things. Also, many identified with him.

When he passed, we were reminded that the greatest among us (the richest, most creative, most successful) are subject to death just like everyone else.

It shocked a lot of people who don’t have a biblical foundation.


67 posted on 10/07/2011 2:33:33 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toma29; All
Steve Jobs Was Not God

For sure.

And yet, it is impossible to count the number of lives his life blessed.

68 posted on 10/07/2011 2:33:48 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

I don’t know why but considered himself an artist, and many (including this morning’s editorial in the WSJ) did as well. I can’t find his quote but it was something along the lines that I’m a half artist, half businessman. He was an industrial designer, OK? Are such animals artists? I dunno. One renowned designer of signs, placards, posters, wine labels, book covers, and menus, among other practical things, protested against being called an artist, saying he was an illustrator.


69 posted on 10/07/2011 2:34:21 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: fabian

Mr Forte, WTF are you talking about?


70 posted on 10/07/2011 2:35:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: IamCenny

That was actually someone else who called you on the use of wiki ... you may want to try to keep up a bit better.

I am laughing at your use of the imageshack photo as though it were the smoking gun.

It’s not.

But you believe what you want to believe.


71 posted on 10/07/2011 2:38:09 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: toma29

I’ve read a few things about Jobs just now. It is interesting the change in tech stuff that he helped bring about. Even though I don’t use it!

I don’t mourn him, and I think the writer is half-way right on this public mourning stuff. Although the difference between Jobs and this Shuttleworth guy - it sounded like Shuttleworth had made his impact on the world. Whereas who knows what Jobs might have come up with next.

But as one poster said - the ipod, etc. may be the next decade’s 8-track.


72 posted on 10/07/2011 2:39:27 PM PDT by 21twelve (Obama Recreating the New Deal: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: updatedscreenname
In 10 years it will be Steve who? MP3 players will be in the same junk box with 8 tracks. iPAD & MacBook will be piled in the same corner with 286 computers.

Pixar may be the only lasting technology as it evolves into lifelike photoshop animation to totally eliminate actors and sets.


MP3 players were around before the iPod. The point is that Apple's device made the format and, more importantly, digital music storage popular with everyone, not just geeks like me. Digital music and infrastructures like iTunes aren't going anywhere.

Similarly, PDA devices were around long before the iPhone and iPad. But they were devices purchased by geeks like me at technical conferences - we'd spend the conference poking at them with styluses, write some code for them and then leave them to gather dust because they were annoying to use and there was no market for them. Apple's devices changed all that - PDAs and tablet devices are going to remain a part of the world's culture for many years to come.

And descendants of Mac OS X will be around in 10 years, too.

On the negative side, Apple's walled-garden ecosystem concept for devices and software will also be around for years after Jobs' passing. This consumer-hostile idea has already spread to Amazon and Microsoft.
73 posted on 10/07/2011 2:40:57 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

“He was an industrial designer, OK? Are such animals artists? I dunno. One renowned designer of signs, placards, posters, wine labels, book covers, and menus, among other practical things, protested against being called an artist, saying he was an illustrator.”

Here we get into the vagaries of the word itself. You have to one side masters of high art like Shakespeare, Beethoven, or Michelangelo, which he clearly was not. But we also call carpenters artists, because they ply their craft as experts. Jobs was an artist in that sense, though I wouldn’t say his expertise was in design, a craft closer to high art than others, as such. I don’t actually know how closely he was involved in that process. But I do know that for the computer world, that sort of thing is the result of code, and that Jobs didn’t write code.

He was an idea man, and his ideas may have been the most perfeclty precise of any that a non-programmer could ever dream, without being an actual programmer. But still there’s that divide. Shakespeare could have had the plot, themes, characterizations, etc., of “Hamlet” explained to him in detail, but he had to actually write it. And the artistry is in the writing.

If Jobs was an artist, it was as a dreamer. A visionary, a guru, a seer. Someone who could see where the market was headed. Moreover, as an administrator. Not the sort of administrator who works as efficiently as possible, squeezing every last bit out of every last penny; I don’t think Apple even had a budget in its early years. No, he bossed via motivation. Surrounded himself with the highest talent and ran them like a slave driver with the whip of belief. Belief in himself, his ideas. It was a cult of personality.

Are cult leaders, even of the religion of technology, artists? Probably not.


74 posted on 10/07/2011 2:48:50 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

True.The Iphone is assembled in China!


75 posted on 10/07/2011 2:49:54 PM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Okay, well I told you decide for yourself.

It’s odd that he kept the same diet as an HIV patient would, that it’s possible that kaposi sarcoma can mimic pancreatic cancer, and then the images (possibly fake) that show HIV positive for a Californian SSN, with Steve Jobs full name. It adds up, but again, decide for yourself.


76 posted on 10/07/2011 2:51:17 PM PDT by IamCenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Rad_J

Probably not El Rushbo, who is a die hard Apple fan.


77 posted on 10/07/2011 2:52:48 PM PDT by hawkboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

“The point is that Apple’s device made the format and, more importantly, digital music storage popular with everyone, not just geeks like me.”

Exactly. No one uses the 1981 IBM PC anymore, but only an idiot would argue it will ever be “PC, what?” That was the watershed, and even if it had started collecting duct the next month it would live forever in history. Jobs had a bunch of watershed.


78 posted on 10/07/2011 2:52:48 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

It’s one thing to be an idea man, or a visionary, it’s a whole other kettle of fish, to make that vision a reality.


79 posted on 10/07/2011 2:52:48 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: toma29
Steve Jobs was great at what he did. There's no need to further fellate the man's memory. He made good computers, he made good phones, he made good music players. He sold them well. He got obscenely rich. He enabled an entire generation of techie design fetishists to walk around with more attractive gadgets.

I won't shed any tears when "Hamilton Nolan" dies.

Generally speaking, Ayn Rand was wrong about everything, but reading something like this makes me think she had a point.

People are mourning someone who was a part of their lives, of their youth, somebody who made the world a better and a more interesting place.

Maybe the tributes can get a tiny bit excessive, but you shouldn't have to lay down your life for some cause to receive some gratitude when you die.

Living, working, achieving something -- even when you get a lot of money for it -- can also be reason for appreciation.

80 posted on 10/07/2011 2:53:01 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson