>APPARENTLY PAUL AND THE PAULETTES DON’T FOLLOW THE OATH.
So Paul, by the mere questioning of the constitutionality of the killing of a US Citizen by the CIA and/or military under the presumed commands of the commander in chief is violating his oath to protect and defend the Constitution? How so?
It would be interesting to hear a SCOTUS opinion on this but that’ll never happen.
Yep, he is in clear violation of the oath which he takes VOLUNTARILY.