To: driftdiver; arderkrag
Oh, I don’t have a problem with that. Nobody owes Free Republic free content.
9 posted on
09/07/2011 9:23:10 AM PDT by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Well, no. But it's a bit dishonest to use your blog as a primary source of information at another website. If you're just giving your views on things for the general freeper audience, why not just make a FR topic? If you want to blog, then blog and let people find it on their own.
Now, I will say that it is completely different if you post something somewhere else where it's behind a subscription wall of some sort where the general public can't see it and you want freeper input.
15 posted on
09/07/2011 9:30:15 AM PDT by
arderkrag
(Georgia is God's Country. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Its not about free content for FR. Its about taking FR users and driving them to their blog, away from FR.
Plus blogs tend to be even worse sources than the lame stream media.
22 posted on
09/07/2011 9:40:53 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson