Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring
It's alright! We love candidates that adore amnesty here on Freerepublic. We also like it when they impose Big government EO mandates on the general population concerning matters of health care. Like vaccines for noncontagious diseases.

We want those people in the party, heck we want them to get the nomination!

2 posted on 08/28/2011 7:22:25 PM PDT by Tempest (Google: Rick perry bi-national healthcare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tempest

u mad?


3 posted on 08/28/2011 7:26:25 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tempest

I’m all for open borders; HOWEVER, open borders and a welfare state are incompatible ... Pick one!


22 posted on 08/28/2011 7:57:42 PM PDT by taxcutisapayraise (Making Statism Unpopular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Tempest; P-Marlowe
HPV is a communicable disease. Your daughter (if you have one) can marry a man who unknowingly carries HPV, and she would never have had done anything wrong, but still ended up infected.

Also,

by Farrel Buchinsky, MD: (found at bottom of article: http://rrpwebsite.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/category.display/category_ID/352/

The authors do indeed say "we cannot rule out transmission through direct mouth-to-mouth contact." This issue is further addressed in the accompanying editorial by Stina Syrjänen who is from the University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

"In a study that my colleagues and I performed, involving married couples with healthy oral mucosa (sampling at baseline and at months 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36), the results suggested that the oral route is an important means of HPV transmission between partners: one spouse had a 10-fold risk of acquiring persistent oral HPV infection if the other spouse had persistent oral HPV infection. Oral sex was not associated with oral or genital HPV infection in these studies, and oral HPV infection in one spouse was unrelated to genital HPV infection in the other spouse. In our study and in the study by D'Souza and colleagues [that is the one that appeared in the New England Journal of Med on May 10], however, the patients were different: the couples we studied were younger and had no evidence of clinical lesions in the oropharynx, whereas those in the study by D'Souza and colleagues were older patients who had oropharyngeal cancer."


52 posted on 08/28/2011 8:51:53 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson