Posted on 08/28/2011 7:17:37 PM PDT by mnehring
Wrong RP, albeit, Perry isn’t much better on immigration issues than Paul.
I’m all for open borders; HOWEVER, open borders and a welfare state are incompatible ... Pick one!
Normally I would oppose those things but we need to stop Obama from winning! Ron Paul has an R by his name, let’s stop the attacks and get behind Ron Paul.
Best Parody Ever!
Your a supposed Palin supporter but Palin supports Perry so why do you peddling Perry hate ? You seem only to trash anyone who threatens the Dem candidates ?
You don't seem too concerned that your Left Wing astro turfing help the Marxist ?
Just like your trashing Meg Whitman when she up against Jerry Brown ?
But then again you hated Whitman way more that Jerry Brown.
In fact you never attacked Jerry Brown just the
Republican candidate just like
Now with your Perry Hating posts! Are you happy you helped work to get Brown elected ?
True. It wouldn’t bother me a bit if he (Perry) did a big flip flop on some border issues. But to Perry’s credit, he did sign a law requiring photo identification to vote.
Tempest,
You’re sarcasm is unhinging the most unstable of Perry Apologists, keep it up!
Um. No thanks.
I’ve heard the libertarian position on immigration expressed a number of times as: Any immigrant who can come to the US and not become a ward of the state, i.e., be self-supporting, then an many as desire to come should be allowed. No limits.
And that sounds about like what RP is saying in so many words.
My statement made it clear that immigrants must be self-supporting under the libertarian idea. I'm totally against the libertarian ideas on immigration and many other issues.
I often heard Neil Boortz state that libertarian idea before the amnesty debates of 2006 and 2007. Haven't listened to Boortz much in years so don't know if he still states that position.
If Ron Paul is all that is standing between Obama and a second term get ready to swear him in again. He would be squashed like a fruit salad.
I have yet to see anything wherein he is not clueless and would sell out every US interest because of his false view of the constitution.
I find it interesting that you are opposed to a candidate who would not only crush Obama but bring in an overwhelming Republican majority with him. Hence on the surface you have no concerns about conservative victory.
California will elect to give aid and be the gateway.
A fence of sensors will work just fine — as long as triggering the sensors sets off landmines that blanket the entire area with anesthetic sliver shrapnel & tear gas so when the border patrol responds they just cart away the unconscious bodies.
This should tell you that we need to stop fighting because it only helps George Soros when we fight. Because George logs on here every night just to hear us bicker over Ron Paul to his utter glee.
Get behind Ron Paul now before it's too late. Anoint!!! Anoint!!!!
What's an "u mad"?
I would think that Sarah Palin endorsing someone for governor against a liberal opponent at the state level should not be construed as an endorsement at the national level....
I think you could buy 3 miles of fence for the price of one of those awesome sounding landmines.
I think some Paul supporters are playing games trying to change the subject of any critical threads about Paul to starting fights between other candidates. I’m in the Palin or Cain camp (with Perry tied in my third tier choices) and have seen this kind of stuff on threads about all of them. Paul people love to play games and really want to get the Palin and Perry people fighting and ripping each other to shreds so Paul can be the ‘last man standing’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.