[P-Marlowe]

My problem is not that this article was posted. The fact is that it was posted from a Conservatives for Palin blog, which suggests that Sarah Palin would have approved of this hit piece. I don't think she would. Palin is not out to get Rick Perry, she is out to get Obama out of office and this article does nothing to accomplish that, and basically does nothing but poison the well with the same kind of nonsense that poisoned Sarah Palin in 2008. That rat poison in 2008 was actually being injected by her running mate's staff. It's no wonder they lost.

We don't need to associate these hit pieces with Sarah Palin. She very well may either be Perry's running mate or Perry may be hers. So if you want to post a hit piece on Perry, don't make it appear as if Sarah Palin is behind it.

[xzins]

I went to C4P’s “Palin Posts” section and not one of them was by Sarah Palin. Hmmmmmm.....

I have not heard Palin and Perry bashing each other. They probably realize what you do, P-M, that one or the other (or both) could be a nominee they need to support in the very near future.

When does “vetting” become “opposition research” on behalf of the liberals?

[Finny]

So if you want to post a hit piece on Perry, don't make it appear as if Sarah Palin is behind it.

If you want to be taken seriously by me and probably plenty of others who read and/or post here, STOP using word "hate" to define peoples' motivations for arguing against a politician.

[Finny]

One other thing, and more to the point:

My problem is not that this article was posted. The fact is that it was posted from a Conservatives for Palin blog, which suggests that Sarah Palin would have approved of this hit piece.

The term "concern troll" comes to mind. If you have issues with the Conservatives for Palin blog, that's fine, and it's fine that you voice the concern here, as we're all FRiends sharing ideas, but ... what does it have to do with the price of tea in China, the primaries, or the accuracy of what's being argued against Perry? Who CARES if it was from the C4P blog?

And as for its appearing on the C4P blog as suggesting that Palin would have approved of "this hit piece," SPEAK FOR YOURSELF, FRiend. In my opinion, anyone who assumes that anything that appears on that blog has the approval of Palin, is making a stupid assumption.

[wmfights]

The fact is that it was posted from a Conservatives for Palin blog,...

Are you surprised?

I for one am hoping she does not run. I don't think Gov. Palin can win and I see candidates that I am convinced will win.

Gov. Perry is by far the strongest candidate in the field. He may not be perfect, but he's Gov of the 2nd most populous State. He has seen exceptional job growth in the State. He is Pro-Life, and most importantly he shoots coyotes that threaten his dog. IOW, he is everything the country is going to be looking for, experience/decisiveness over incompetence.

The strength of Gov. Perry is evidenced by the attacks being made against him by all parties.