Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
"Well, Isaac Newton certainly didn’t have any problem crediting God with being the cause of everything. He looked as science as a great way to learn more about God."

Isaac Newton and many of the other great scientists of that time understood that they had a particular philosophical view of reality and could therefore separate the two and 'do science' quite well.

Scientists today do not understand that naturalism is a particular philosophy in its own right and therefore unwittingly practice more philosophy than they do science.

93 posted on 08/19/2011 6:52:53 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan

Then perhaps they should stop giving out PHD’s to people who receive a doctorate in the physical sciences, since scientists have so chosen to distance themselves from philosophy.

And since the rest of the world recognizes that that is a philosophy in its own right, all the while *scientists* deny that they have a philosophical position, they have just demonstrated that their critical thinking skills are more than lacking, thus rendering them unqualified to practice science at all. All their work should be suspect based on their stunted reasoning skills.


99 posted on 08/19/2011 8:04:41 PM PDT by metmom (Be the kind of woman that when you wake in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson