My original statement which led to our interchange was that one cannot prove a God and one cannot prove no-God. You told me, paraphrasing from memory rather than going back to check, to describe an attribute of my God and you would disprove it. I then said He was all attributes and from there you launched into a diatribe which foolishly led the conversation off course. So, let me take another stab at it.
God is all of creation. He set the whole thing in motion and He determined the principles on which everything operates. He is not full of crap, as you postulated, but He did set things up so that you can be.
He gave us free will to make errors and, in fact, seems to have made it easier to make errors than not to. Yet, in essence. God is Love, Truth, and Life.
So, help yourself. Disprove any of that. Prove No-God. Prove that God is not Love and conversely that Love is not Godly. The same with Truth and Life. It would also be helpful if, as you disprove those, you will show how evolution accounts for them. Surely you don’t deny those abstracts - Love, Truth, and Life - exist. Yet, are they scientific? Can they be affirmed using the Scientific Method?
Another good post...I've asked this of the God rejecting libtards for years now...how to prove or disprove Love, scientifically speaking.
And my tagline arose out of this very subject.