By definition, believing in God is to believe in an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent being that surely MADE i.e. *created* all we see and know and experience...therefore you just destroyed your very own argument...you just admitted that a majority of educated scientists believed in God then you turned around and made the non-sensical leap that the LESS educated someone is the more likely they are to be creationists. You JUST provided proof of the exact opposite. I see logic continues to not be one of your, ummm...strong points.
Only if you redefine “creationist” such that I am also one.
I am not.
Thus your argument is invalid and entirely based upon semantics.
I am a scientist. I believe in God. I am not a creationist.
Most scientists in America are people of faith. Almost all of them reject creationism and could not, in good faith, be called creationists.
But you are not arguing in good faith.