This auhor says the bloodlust came first, followed by the incredibly elaborate intellectual/political rationalization. If I understand his thesis correctly, then Breivik could have actually chosen any rationale at all --- say, Animal Rights, or Technoracy, or Spanish Carlism, or Steampunk, or Trotskyism, or Lutheranism, or Space Colonization, or Tibetian Buddhism or Wicca --- as a mask for what was a far more visceral drive.
But I wonder if that's true?
(Excerpt) Read more at cinchreview.com ... That source isn't on the excerpt list.
Why are you trying to direct traffic to this blog?
Are you a scumsucking blogpimp?