[DiogenesLamp]

In case you have not noticed, this crank legal theory gets even less traction than the born-in-Kenya theory, and would require an even bigger conspiracy. That native-born citizens qualify as natural-born was clear and settled long ago. There are no constitutional scholars questioning it, just pretenders such as we see here.

That people would challenge your notion of a "Geocentric" Universe and refuse to respect your Robed Clergy, ought to be clue enough for you that Your false, albeit established religious dogma is on a collision course with reality.

The Law will obey the people, and as we educate the people, the "Law" will eventually follow.

[x]

That people would challenge your notion of a "Geocentric" Universe and refuse to respect your Robed Clergy, ought to be clue enough for you that Your false, albeit established religious dogma is on a collision course with reality.

I guess you are comparing the commonly-held definition of "natural born citizen" with the old, pre-Copernican, earth-centered model of the universe.

That gets at the difference between hard science and interpretive activities.

You can overturn a scientific theory through more accurate observation and carefully crafted experiments.

But with interpretative activities (you can't really call them "sciences") unless you can bring to light some long-unknown document you don't get the same kind of refutations.

It looks like what you're doing is trying to make one set of wills prevail over another set of wills, and that's not what happened with Copernicus and his scientific revolution.