Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NaturalBornConservative
Good post! Though the reference to fractional-reserve banking having been created in 1913 (as mentioned above) does call the article's credibility into question a bit.

I'm of two minds about 100% reserve banking. I lean towards it, but I can sympathize with the argument that fractional-reserve banking should be permitted as long as there is full disclosure to the customer. Let the market decide.

Actually, a system where both options are available would be ideal. Government guarantees for deposits should end, of course (they just print the FDIC money anyway).

People should realize, too, that full-reserve banking would mean that a bank's customers would pay the bank to hold their money. Come to think of it, that's not so different from what we have now.

17 posted on 07/10/2011 5:03:50 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The state is that great fiction, by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BfloGuy
"It’s the system America adopted in 1913..." Who said it was "created" in 1913? Not me. The focus is on America and the source of our current economic woes.
18 posted on 07/10/2011 8:04:17 PM PDT by NaturalBornConservative (The Author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson