Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bushpilot1

Well, all I can do is post factually and fairly. I’m probably not going to directly respond to any more of the personal attacks, except maybe to note that they’ve occurred.

The fact that you have to post a personal attack in the first place shows that you can’t win on the basis of the facts.


95 posted on 07/01/2011 11:00:42 PM PDT by Jeff Winston (Run, Sarah... Run, and win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
The fact that you have to post a personal attack in the first place shows that you can’t win on the basis of the facts.

*YOU* cannot win on the basis of facts. Here's an example from some days earlier.

----------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Winston said:

Under the power to adopt a uniform system of naturalization Congress, as early as 1790,... "and that the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens.

If you can shoot down my reasoning, you're certainly welcome to have a go at it. I doubt that you will, since you repeatedly completely refused, about half a dozen times, to respond at all to my analysis of Wong Kim Ark. But, there it is.

------------------------------------------------------- My response: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:29:13 AM

I am very glad that you quoted the Naturalization act of 1790. That means you accept it as part of your argument, therefore you will have to accept ALL of it! It goes on further to say:

"Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose FATHERS have never been resident in the United States:"

As you yourself point out, this act was produced a mere 3 years after the adoption of the constitution (actually just 1 year) , and the Members of Congress were pretty much the same people as the Original Delegates. This act gives a clear insight to what they were thinking regarding citizenship status of the children of Foreign Fathers.

Make note. It not only prohibits them from being "Natural born citizens" it prohibits granting them ANY citizenship at all! They are not EVEN citizens.

----------------------------------------------------------

And what did you do? Rather than addressing the point, you ran away and whined that I was uncivil towards you. After dealing with you a few times, it's a wonder that anyone IS civil towards you.

116 posted on 07/02/2011 6:58:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson