Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Whatever Federal Rules of Evidence said before 1996, this law is the current standard.

I know i'm beating a dead horse, but no subsequent act of congress can modify the meaning of an Article of the U.S. Constitution. THAT requires an amendment. The DUTY of Governmental officials per constitutional requirement is not to play legal "let's believe and make pretend" but to verify ACTUAL and TRUE FACTS. Actual and true facts are not subject to this or that body "Declaring or Proclaiming" the one thing to be equal to the other.

89 posted on 06/27/2011 2:52:39 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Actually "true facts" are certainly covered in that statute that includes data base systems as valid record repositories.

I'm sure that somewhere in the bowels of the government we have something about the admissability of DVDs, CDs, hard disk drives, video tape, film, holographic copies (and maybe even Jefferson's device that allows a writer to produce 2 copies at one time), sound recordings, photographs, color slides, negatives, positives, etc.

Looking through the Constitution I didn't see the word "paper"? Did you?

91 posted on 06/27/2011 2:57:49 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson