[jh4freedom]

5. Myself, I believe that the longer President Obama and Kapiolani officials refuse to let reporters examine President Obama’s Aug.4. 1961 records, the more VOTES President Obama will LOSE on election day Nov. 2012, because VOTERS will start thinking that President Obama must be hiding something if he won’t allow Kapiolani officials to let reporters examine his Aug. 4, 1961 birth records.

---

Hospitals don’t maintain medical records for 50 years for a routine procedure like an uncomplicated birth. The federal law requires storage of medical records for seven years from the date of discharge and the longest that I have ever heard of a hospital maintaining routine medical records is 25 years.
The exception to the above is if there are chronic conditions that require multiple admissions over many years, then the records still exist.
On the bright side, Zero losing on Election Day 2012 is a good thing, right?

[john mirse]

Hospitals don’t maintain medical records for 50 years for a routine procedure like an uncomplicated birth. The federal law requires storage of medical records for seven years from the date of discharge and the longest that I have ever heard of a hospital maintaining routine medical records is 25 years.

The exception to the above is if there are chronic conditions that require multiple admissions over many years, then the records still exist.

On the bright side, Zero losing on Election Day 2012 is a good thing, right?

*******

Are saying above that Kapiolani Hospital would not have a single piece of paper or any data in their computer records that says that a Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was a patient there on Aug. 4, 1961, because it has been over 25 years since she was supposed to be a patient there?

If you are correct, then why doesn't President Obama simply allow Kapiolani officials to make a public statement like this one:

"We regret to say that Aug. 4, 1961 is over 25 years ago, so we don't have a single piece of paper or any information in our computer database that says that a Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was ever a patient here on Aug. 4, 1961, because we routinely destroy our patient records that are 25 years old or older."

Now would the statement above be so hard to make by Kapiolani officials?

However, because Kapiolani officials have not yet come out and told us that they destroyed ALL records that are 25 years or older, I can only conclude that the officials still have some Stanley Obama information, or worse, they never had any Stanley Obama information to begin with, because their records shockingly show that Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was NEVER A PATIENT there on Aug. 4, 1961 as President Obama claims.

JUST WONDERING ABOUT PRESIDENT BUSH, THE LAST ONE: Are you telling us that the Connecticut hospital where the last President Bush was born has no record of his birth, because at least 25 years have passed since Bush was born there?