Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
The full faith and credit clause appears to allow Hawaii's courts and legislative bodies to do that ~ use subtle nuance ~ and make the rest of us live with it.

Hawaii's courts do not trump Articles of the Constitution. Neither do Federal courts. Federal courts can declare anything they want, but that does not make it true.

114 posted on 06/28/2011 8:44:00 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama hides behind the Grass Skirts of Hawaiian Bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

“The full faith and credit clause appears to allow Hawaii’s courts and legislative bodies to do that ~ use subtle nuance ~ and make the rest of us live with it.”

Hawaii’s courts do not trump Articles of the Constitution. Neither do Federal courts. Federal courts can declare anything they want, but that does not make it true.

The “Full Faith and Credit clause” IS in an Article of the Constitution: Article IV, Section 1.
It is not about Hawai’i courts nor the federal courts, it’s in the original wording of the Constitution of the United States.

From your point of view, which branch of government should get to decide whether a candidate or a president has met the natural born citizen requirements of Article II, Section 1?


115 posted on 06/28/2011 9:48:36 AM PDT by jh4freedom (Mr. "O" has got to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson