Do you know what the Hawaii State Supreme Court says that means? There are subtle nuances in legal jargon.
That is certainly one of my primary concerns. I also have concern with the reluctance of a department to release independent images of something which is now supposedly in the public domain. It is the entire atmosphere of hide and obfuscate to which I object. We should not be playing such games when it comes to our President who by the very nature of the office should NOT be entitled to privacy regarding his records of eligibility or fitness for office.
Do you know what the Hawaii State Supreme Court says that means? There are subtle nuances in legal jargon.
Not specifically. I recognize it as a legal dodge which allows them to cover for amended records.