Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Doe Eyes
The AP article references FERC. Here's a few graphs from FERC that show current frequency variations; They already drop much lower 59.99 Hz. I've never seen less than 59.93 or more than 60.02 where I work, we are in MISO (https://www.midwestiso.org/Pages/Home.aspx) the upper midwest.




69 posted on 06/26/2011 1:11:29 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: All

Here’s a .pdf that might outline what is proposed, I haven’t read through it yet but will;

http://www.nerc.com/docs/standards/dt/Project_2007-12_Draft_1_Comment_Report_2011_05_05.pdf


72 posted on 06/26/2011 1:15:05 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: dynoman
The graphs are correct - it isn't unusual to briefly drop below 59.95 HZ, and occasionally, we hit above 60.05 HZ as well. The two biggest drivers of frequency excursions outside of the 0.05 HZ bandwidth are loss of large generating units on the interconnection and major changes in transaction schedules between different utilities.

I remember a few years ago when a utility had 2 1200+ megawatt generators trip off line at the same time. Frequency dipped to 59.87 HZ. One of my industrial customers actually experienced an automatic transfer to his backup generator due to operation of an underfrequency relay.

122 posted on 06/26/2011 4:45:53 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson