Posted on 06/25/2011 12:05:20 PM PDT by unseen1
0 has no experience other then being groomed to destroy the U.S. and do as much damage as he can. He hasn’t done anything
at all; everything he has done was handed to him or fabricated
to make him look good.
Bachmann needs to step behind someone and push them forward and then attack Obama’s record and decisions like crazy.
Experience? No one cares about that.
Yeap while Senators have more excutive experience than a house member since they ar enot limited to staff mx. They are like house members in for all practical purposes they have zero executive experience. And elected Obama shows the stupidity of electing any congress member be it a Senator or a house member.
Governors make the best presidents...with plenty of executive experience.
You better hope pissant doesn't come to this thread. :O)
It takes a lot of education, cajoling and sophistry to read multi-generational welfare, land grabs, progressive taxation and massive intrusion into the lives of Americans into the responsibilities delineated in the document.
Governing in light of the Framers intent shouldn't be that difficult.
On the other hand, it would be more difficult to be a State Legislature, given their responsibilities which are not found in the Constitution.
It's upside down, and in general, governments don't willingly give back power to the people.
Sure they do because they are seeing how the lack of it is impacting them daily. Ask yourself how likely they will be to make the same mistake again. I think the people will eelct a Govenor this time around. The race will come down IMO to Palin and Mitt. Pick your poision.
Personally, I think that house painters would make the best leaders.
At least they don't have a track record of putting us in the sh!tty situation we are in now via their politics.
I was thinking about him and some others when I wrote that line. the Falcon party will not fly again.
agreed. but sadly no house painters are running this time.
You're ahead of 'yourself' . . . . . . . but right!
yeah but state represenatives have their own consitutions they must follow.
Omaba's case was one primarily of race and NOTHING else...except that for the 8 years of constant BDS garbage, which also helped Obama.
Now, Obama has a record ( a lousy one ! ) and most people are yearning for a real president, who is a leader and has experience.
If a person is seriously accomplished in their field, and honestly articulate, actually understands what they are talking about, and not just pulling a fast one, then they can be President. I don’t think Eisenhower was a governor or a senator, but a General. I think it depends on the individual and what they are truly bringing to the table. If they are convincing enough to get elected with the right principals, then they are capable of learning the Presidency.
If a person is seriously accomplished in their field, and honestly articulate, actually understands what they are talking about, and not just pulling a fast one, then they can be President. I don’t think Eisenhower was a governor or a senator, but a General. I think it depends on the individual and what they are truly bringing to the table. If they are convincing enough to get elected with the right principals, then they are capable of learning the Presidency.
Obama sucks for several reasons, but the primary one, believe it or not, isn’t his lack of experience, that was just a good reason not to have elected him. The primary reason he sucks is because his IDEAS suck. He is a quasi-socialist liberal. I’d take a conservative 7-11 owner over Obama.
well there is that but even if his ideas were good. He would still be failing because he doess’t have the skill set to be a good POTUS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.