Nat the FogBlower fits a few of those descriptions in your post 250.
Donofrio reply:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ed. No case ever came to the US Supreme Court regarding eligibility for POTUS since Minor was decided, so there was no reason for the case to be consulted on natural born citizenship until now.
That doesn’t change the fact that it remains precedent. Furthermore, the Court in WKA did not ignore Minor, they actually followed Minor. I’ll have more on this in my next report. But Gray made a grave error of legal diction in WKA as to Minor…
The Court in Minor specifically stated it was avoiding the 14th Amendment as to citizenship, whereas Gray made it appear as if the Court in Minor was construing the 14th Amendment as to citizenship. Gray’s statement was very wrong.
Gray also cited to the dissent in Dred Scott but failed to mention that the passage he quoted was from the dissent. That is also very wrong. Gray really creeps me out. – leo