[rxsid]

"The entire thrust of Wong Kim Ark, which is as close as we actually have to a precedent, is that NO citizen parents are required to make a natural born citizen - only being born in the United States. "

WKA was not found to be a "natural born Citizen." Even the Ankeny court in Indian acknowledged that. Why do you spread lies? What's your agenda?

[rxsid]

Indiana.

http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf

"the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark", the state court of Indiana had stated this in the previous paragraph:

The Court held that Mr. Wong Kim Ark was a citizen [Edit: "citizen", but NOT a "natural born Citizen"] of the United States “at the time of his birth.” 14

What does footnote 14 say?

We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a “natural born Citizen” using the Constitution's Article II language is immaterial.

It's "immaterial" according to this ridiculous state court ruling.

[philman_36]

Why do you spread lies? What's your agenda?
Sun Tzu - All warfare is based on deception.