Your posts are just rambling nonsequiturs. To justify your stance, you cite polls? The whole purpose of the constitutional election regime is to avoid the idiocy of referenda like your moronic polls. As for populous states never agreeing on anything, no s*** sherlock. But if you get a kickass demagogue on the campaign trail who knows how to pander to them, they’ll line up right quick.
And then a candidate could win the Presidency by winning a mere 51% of the vote in just the 11 biggest states — that is, a mere 26% of the nation’s votes.
Your demagogue scenario supports your support for the current system, how?
For what it’s worth, I neither condone nor appreciate mvymvy’s cut and paste tactic.