No, I do understand. I’ve never said it was a conspiracy. Those are your words, not mine. I don’t know and you don’t either. You’ve made a lot of claims you simply cannot back up, such as how the file was handled for 50 years inside an office I would bet hard money you’ve never even seen, much less worked in. I’ve only pointed out obvious flaws that I have observed based on my experience as an Electrical Engineer and Xerox trained copier repair boy back in the day. You’ve conjured up the rest and dismiss outright what you don’t understand.
As a computer engineer and Kodak employee and longtime observer of document processing technology, I’ve explained the “obvious flaws” with ease consistent with technology & history.
I’ve never met you, but I can guess you’re using a Windows-type PC with monitor, keyboard, mouse, etc. to access FR and post this stuff - because it’s just what people do and how things work at a certain point in technological history. While you were fixing copiers, I was studying document decomposition & compression in light of severe storage limitations. I don’t have to see the building to guess how they used common technology to solve normal office document management problems, and see how modern rendering of old files produces predictable artifacts.