To: MHGinTN
Implying that Leo is behind the curve as compared to FR birthers is laughable. He was pursuing the legal definition of natural-born citizen before the concept ever occurred to FR birthers.
35 posted on
06/21/2011 4:13:46 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
To: BuckeyeTexan
You haven't been following Leo's vacillations apparently. Do an FR search on Leo for the last month or two. This current missive contradicts the last thing from him posted at FR, IIRC.
37 posted on
06/21/2011 4:18:36 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
To: BuckeyeTexan
Implying that Leo is behind the curve as compared to FR birthers is laughable. He was pursuing the legal definition of natural-born citizen before the concept ever occurred to FR birthers. I don't think we'll ever sort out how a pro-gay-marriage 9/11 truther who wanted Bush tried for treason ever became the Constitutional scholar of choice on this forum.
39 posted on
06/21/2011 4:22:38 PM PDT by
Kleon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson