Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Pilsner

IANAL (which means I am not a lawyer) but I don’t think this law case says what the Vattle Birthers think it does. Because:

1: It sure doesn’t say that NBCs(which means Natural Born Citizens) are ONLY the people born to two citizens;

2: It says that at COMMON LAW, some courts hold that even children of foreigners born inside a country are natural born citizens;

3: It says that question, however, is not even applicable to this case so there is no need to even talk about kids born to two foreigners.

Sooo, how does a case that says all that get to be a precedent case on Obama??? I don’t even see where this court says it is definitely still a issue.

Which looks to me like the Arkansas case is right that was in the Internet Article that NBC (which means Natural Born Citizen) had to be defined by a court.


118 posted on 06/21/2011 10:51:46 PM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Squeeky
BWAHAHAHAHA
Which looks to me like the Arkansas case...
It's called Ankeny and it happened in Indiana!
Don't worry, even Donofrio got it wrong.
...the Arkeny opinion issued by the Indiana Court of Appeals...
Twice...The Arkeny Court has it backwards.

Not laughing at you, just at something very funny.

120 posted on 06/21/2011 11:03:45 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson