Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Ray

“However, these days fighting back against a bully is probably considered an aggressive action.”

It is. Under “zero tolerance,” both the bully and the kid who defends him/herself are held equally accountable. The bully usually couldn’t care less about the school’s punishment, while the bullied kid usually does.

Real fair, eh?


27 posted on 06/20/2011 2:44:55 PM PDT by piytar (Obama's Depression. Say it early, say it often. Why? Because it's TRUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: piytar

Actually, I think there is some merit in the zero tolerance policy.

It teaches kids at an early age that authority figures, adults, employers, supervisors, etc. simply can’t be trusted to have integrity and be fair, and that they are incapable of making even simple judgments on matters like these.

It’s a tough lesson, but fair or not, it is largely true. The sooner a kid learns that those charged with responsibility refuse to exercise it justly, the better.


30 posted on 06/20/2011 2:48:59 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Nope.
That’s why I have told my kids that, if they fight in self defense, I’ll back them up all the way. They might get punished, but not by me...


49 posted on 06/20/2011 4:42:29 PM PDT by Little Ray (Best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson