[edge919]

Sorry, but you’re falling for nonsense. Nagamine’s objections neither clarify nor pertain to how the subpoena was issued nor its validity. Her objection contradicts itself by citing the part of Hawaiian law that acknowledges that Taitz would have a direct and tangible interest in obtaining a copy of the record.

[tired_old_conservative]

I would assume you have little experience with legal communications. This type of “no, but” communication is anything but nonsense. It's very common. I wrote one much like it last week.

I know you folks will never admit that anything pertaining to an Obama suit represents an error on the part of the birther attorney, but the outcome of Orly's nonsense will speak for itself. And it won't be her getting access to anything with this kindergarten stab at a subpoena.