Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid
One thing that bothers me about Obama's long form birth certificate that Obama released on April 27, 2011 is this: How can Hawaii registrar Onaka now say that he is forbidden by Hawaii privacy laws to allow reporters to examine Obama's original birth certificate that is in the archives, when Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011? Doesn't the phrase "in the public domain" take over here?

1. April 27, 2011, Obama releases his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference.

2. HAWAII REGISTRAR ONAKA: But now when reporters ask Hawaii official Onaka to allow them to examine the original birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, Onaka---as I understand it---declares that he cannot do so because of privacy laws.

3. Huh? I thought that when Obama VOLUNTARILY released his long form on April 27, 2011, the long form birth certificate became part of the public domain, that is, I thought that Obama gave up his right to hide behind privacy laws when he VOLUNTARILY released his long form himself on April 27, 2011.

4. Again, how in the world can Onaka---whose name is stamped on Obama's long form birth certificate---on the one hand, claim that privacy laws forbid him from allowing reporters to examine Obama's original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, when, on the other hand, Obama has already VOLUNTARILY released his long form birth certificate on April 27, 2011?

5. It makes no sense to me.

6. To me, it seems that Hawaii officials and Obama are trying to hide something damaging to Obama that is on the long form in the Hawaii archives but is not on the long form birth certificate that Obama released to the public on April 27, 2011.

7. PRESIDENT OBAMA RESPONSIBLE FOR ONAKA'S STONEWALLING? Why doesn't President Obama simply tell Onaka to allow reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the HAWAII archives that should have the same EXACT information that is on the copy that President Obama released on April 27, 2011 to great fanfare at a White House press conference?

8. I think that Registrar Onaka and Obama are hiding something.

9. I wish that reporters and the public would put continuous pressure on President Obama during this 2012 presidential campaign to allow them to look at his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, because if Obama refuses to allow reporters to examine the original long form that is in the Hawaii archives, then I can only conclude that President Obama is trying to hide something.

10. And with every day that goes by without President Obama allowing reporters to examine his original long form birth certificate in the Hawaii archives, I say that President Obama loses another vote on election day Nov. 2012.

28 posted on 06/14/2011 8:11:08 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: john mirse

6. To me, it seems that Hawaii officials and Obama are trying to hide something damaging to Obama that is on the long form in the Hawaii archives but is not on the long form birth certificate that Obama released to the public on April 27, 2011.

But we know from Hawaii’s governor, that there is no long-form birth certificate in the Department of health, just something in the archives:

“It was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down ...”

Hawaii can’t release what Hawaii doesn’t have.


69 posted on 06/15/2011 2:56:52 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson