Info found in Sarah’s pile of emails?
BTTT
Aw come on man, a conspiracy to change the meaning of the Constitution just so an affirmative action slug can be placed int he White House? Incredible!
If you want to use a commentary to negate the natural born clause, than a commentary will also negate the separation clause.
The enemy is an evil bastard
“looked into”.....translates to cover up
sfl
what do u think about it?
“...looks like Obama’s people have looked into matter of “Natural born” as far back as early 2006”
*********************
The movement to remove the constitutional safeguards on natural born go back much further than that!
In fact a very good article on precisely that appeared only a coupla days ago..........?????
Comment: Personally, I am heartsick.
Obama’s eligibility is about far, far more than Obama. It is like pulling a bandage off a wound and seeing the hopeless, festering, and malodorous gangrene underneath. Fundamentally, every legislator, secretary of state, all state attorney generals, the entire electoral college, the Supreme Court and lower level judges, our highest military, all law enforcement agencies, and the conservative media are **CHOOSING** to overlook the oozing petulance of identity theft, impersonation of a Commander in Chief, election fraud, and fraudulently taking millions of dollars in campaign donations.
All of the above people, whose job it is to be our nation's watchdogs, are willing to let a very likely usurper have access to all of our nation's most sensitive secretes, and who can, with a nod of his head, bring down the world's economy, starve billions, and send forth the world's most destructive military power since the dawn of creation.
Unbelievable! There isn't much hope for this nation. If it isn't Obama that brings this nation to its knees it will soon be something else. The moral core of this nation is rotten. No one is willing to stare down evil. Is there even *ONE* real man in this nation?
I pray that God will have mercy on us.
Thanks for posting and I have bookmarked it. I have for some time wondered what the true arguments were against the Constitutional mandate for POTUSA to be a “natural born citizen. This paper makes it very clear it/these arguments are based on the intent for globalization and the supporting features for globalization such as ‘fairness’ for anyone wanting to be POTUSA for any purpose. The paper explains to me the many reasons I have for holding to the Constitution and what the Founding Fathers were well aware of as to nations. I say this as one of the ineligible who was a vet of WWII and a lone brother who was killed on Okinawa. Our parents were immigrants. To add to my story I married a Swedish lady and we had two sons before my wife was ‘naturalized’. Tough luck for my boys as to ‘natural born’ but life in the USA has it’s shortfalls but not it’s opportunities. However, we are all for the USA as an exceptional Nation. In Obama’s case I doubt he and his enablers truly believe the USA is exceptional as to history and spirit and as such want their ‘change’, and I’m more glad than ever the Founding Fathers believed and acted as they did. As far as worth of the paper goes it is most important in that the author admits to the uniqueness and authority of the Founder’s document.
Tthis was undoubtedly a deliberate omission or attempted misdirection with the Obomination squarely in mind.
Yes, we all knew about Herlihy back when but it’s always good to revisit and refresh memories.