Extraordinary charges require extraordinary evidence
///
a minor almost unreported breakin, eventually got rid of a sitting President.
...and a blue dress, hardly extraordinary, revealed Clinton to the nation as a liar, after the “I. DID. NOT. ...” baloney.
the Connecticut SSN alone, is clear evidence of fraud. the research by Butterdezillion and others, easily is more convincing than a blue dress.
(like Hawaii denying a “Virigina Sunahara” exists, even after they sent her name in a birth index...)
instead of telling people it’s not going to happen,
why don’t you light 1 candle, and tell ONE person?
>a minor almost unreported breakin, eventually got rid of a sitting President.
The burglars were caught and had a White House phone number on them and one of them talked and turned out to be ex-CIA
>and a blue dress, hardly extraordinary, revealed Clinton to the nation as a liar
The DNA and taped conversations and confession by Monica Lewinsky were extraordinary evidence.
The rest of what you say is not in in fact as convincing as the DNA and in the mean time until someone with real credibility gets on board nothing will happen. Personally I doubt there’s anything to it myself because I know how easy it is to conjure up a bunch of what sounds like credible evidence but turns out to be garbage when looked at closely by someone without a need to see things their own way. Happens all the time. Meanwhile unless the birthers are able to get what is needed to prove to the average American that they are not just a bunch of obsessives and loonies they will do more harm than good to the country, in my opinion, by reducing the crediblity of the Tea Party and conservatism.