[cantabile]

Sorry you feel that way. I'm trying to keep you from shooting yourself in the foot by allowing the trashing of certain religious minorities who would otherwise be your political allies.

It's your call, of course, but eventually you will have to deal with financial reality. Because those groups you've chosen as designated targets will cease to contribute to your fundraising appeals.

I'd hate to see that happen. I'd like to see FR return to the days of the March for Justice, when it presented a united front to the Clinton propaganda machine.

I support the stated goals of FR. I agree with you that Romney is not a suitable candidate for the Presidency. I would like to see Constitutional restoration gain credence as a political philosophy.

But I see no reason why any of that should entail Mormon-bashing or Catholic-bashing as a necessary consequence. And I'm surprised that you permit and (apparently) endorse both.

[Jim Robinson]

Thanks for allowing me the privilege of operating my web site in the manner I choose. And thanks for your concern. Now get lost if you can’t handle it.

[muawiyah]

Being a fairly good judge of the matter of Catholic bashing I've seen Catholics defend themselves and their religious preferences quite well on FR.

Conservative Catholics are not helpless waifs standing by the road.

Such debates (which you might view as having a lot of "bashing") turn out to be a very good way to gain an understanding of how the other guy sees things ~ I'm sure there are many lurkers who have gone away ILLUMINATED, literally floating in air in front of the Bodhi tree like modern day manifestations of Buddha ~ right down to the appropriate form of lotus position for both hands and legs.

Doesn't get better than that.