Replies

One person's abuse is another person's appropriate use.

Notice here Syncro how the du spins the subject. The RF rules were clear about caucuses, yet the mormon violated the spirit and function of those rules, then got mouthy to the OWNER of the site because he felt the mormon 'rules' superseded FR rules. See how du manipulates the story line.

However, the comments made by JR on that thread and the subsequent removal of the Mormon Caucus were not in keeping with even handed and fair treatment. One poster gets an entire religion in trouble and get's opponents of that religion a free pass to break other rules?

As JR has already warned you - this is his house - you can leave any time. Further, du hasn't learned that life isn't fair - time for him to get over that. However, this board is orders of magnitude fairer than any mormon board on the planet.

I also make no excuses for JR, he was wrong too.

I disagree du - PD was abusing the system and was ignorant to push back at the rules laid out. JR was well within his rights to put a stop to it. You don't like it - take it up with the man.

So, JR can make rules that allow the ambushing of Mormons, but getting people to come to anther site to be ambushed that's just evil mean and nasty! Hypocrite much?

Wow, man up and address JR directly on that issue DU

Before JR zotted SPAMLDS, 'ol spammy was bad mouthing freepers on his website. spammy also gave his camp followers heads up that he was bringing fresh meat over from FR. A large part of JR's zot was in defense of freepers. Now are you claiming that JR's site is set up to ambush mormons? Perhaps you should address it to the man.

There was indeed a schism in the church about it, but you can't find a thing written by the apostles or in the bible that does not have to be interpreted with circular logic to get to the Trinity.

As there have been other schisms when heretical teachings have tried to force their way into the main stream. That doesn't negate the doctrine nor the fact. Further, at no time was the early church polytheistic - so much for mormon restoration.

Read the links from my page here, many go straight to the Catholic encyclopedia on line. I guess that is part of the "Facts not agreeing with me" part...

Your interpretation of the Catholic Encyclopedia has been refuted many times DU - you lie about the meaning of the words used, you lie about what the writers meant when they wrote it and you live in a fantasy world thinking that the writers were coerced into writing what the did write.

Wow, man up and address JR directly on that issue DU

I was addressing you because I was talking about you, deflection... again.

Yes, PD was abusing the system. I have agreed with that already.

As there have been other schisms when heretical teachings have tried to force their way into the main stream. That doesn't negate the doctrine nor the fact. Further, at no time was the early church polytheistic - so much for mormon restoration.

This old Canard again? So Mormons think the oneness of God is defined differently than you do, so you call us polytheistic.

It's a pathetic tactic GZ.

Your interpretation of the Catholic Encyclopedia has been refuted many times DU - you lie about the meaning of the words used, you lie about what the writers meant when they wrote it and you live in a fantasy world thinking that the writers were coerced into writing what the did write.

I link to the whole original article (unlike some) and allow others to check my work, I am not surprised when you disagree with my reading, I expect that, but I keep expecting you to admit that I have a point because I do and you just won't even admit what's staring you in the face.

The man made doctrine of the Trinity has serious problems to anyone who wants to look and putting your fingers in your ears and chanting "it's not true", just won't make them go away.

The Bible is rife with The "Gods" creating Adam and Eve, and Jesus speaking of God in the third person and during the Great Intercessory prayer he draws the analogy of the oneness of the apostles and his oneness with God. to ignore all these things is to not be in touch with reality. We have been 'round and 'round and you are not going to stop being who you are and neither am I.

Delph