[Brown Deer]

I'm not confused at all, it was quite obvious that two words were missing from what I typed. In any case, according to you he's not a natural born citizen, so he's not eligible. SO GET OVER IT!

The Honolulu newspapers were utterly unaware of the history they were witnessing...

That's exactly right. So why would they lie about his age? Want more verification? Get a copy of his SSN application. If you don't want to bother, then shut up about it, because the fact is, he was born on June 18, 1934 and not April 4, 1936, unless you can provide proof otherwise.

[cynwoody]

If you don't want to bother, then shut up about it, because the fact is, he was born on June 18, 1934 and not April 4, 1936, unless you can provide proof otherwise.

That is germane only to the age of the President's father, not to that of the President.

Which has nothing to do with said President's eligibility, cognitively challenged birfers notwithstanding, since the Founders not only failed to define Natural Born, they also failed to include qualifications about the father's age or its accuracy.