[Hotlanta Mike]

I think in this case the meaning is that she does not want a copy of an electronic document, but the real original whereby the data was entered using a typewriter.

This really nails the HDOH because it is assumed they allowed Obama to compile information from MULTIPLE sources in order to produce the latest fabrication.

The specific certificate number 10641

The specific signatures on the original (Sinclair, Dunham Obama, Lee)

The specific date 8.8.1961

As Brown Deer stated, if the document doesn’t look like a 50 year doc they may be in big trouble.

[Fantasywriter]

Thanks again, HM. Yes, it is my total conviction that the ‘abstract’ Barry presented is in no way the original document. After all, Fukino said the original was half handwritten, and the Obots have told me I-don’t-know-how-many-times that Fukino is the gold standard. [Not that I ever believed them.] But there is no redacting what Abercrombie said. He said he actually saw ‘something written down’, ‘a notation’. How can anyone imagine the wacky doc Barry submitted matches that description???

I just hope, if Fuddy tries to wriggle out of the subpoena, the Obots line up to apologize to me. I’ve been called a lot of names for not taking The Won’s—not to mention Fukino’s—word as ontological truth. If Fuddy tries to sidestep this golden opportunity to to put it all out there, I will expect more than a few retractions.