Hang on a second...
The original reporter may have *GROSSLY* misquoted/misrepresented the Sheriff.
The use case given was a suspect running into a neighborhood with cops in pursuit. Would the sheriff search for him and how?
After the original interview, the Sheriff made it *very* clear that he had been misquoted (at best). He stated that in the example given, his deputies would contact each home, explain the situation and REQUEST PERMISSION to search garages & outbuildings. He further stated that the recent, inflammatory court ruling would have NO impact on his commitment to defend & uphold the constitution.
Don’t be a gullible, knee-jerking rube and accept some internet reporter’s (with an undetermined agenda) unverified story at face value. Also, don’t take my word for it either — look it up yourself. I think you will come away with some serious questions for the interviewer (Bricker) just as I have.
It gets worse - check the Facebook post from Bricker as to why she doesn’t have any of this on tape - completely flippant. I guess Bricker has never heard that extraordinary charges require extraordinary evidence - and she doens’t have jack in that department - but sure is milking the controversy she generated for all it is worth.
In looking at the facebook page demanding the sherrif be removed, all I can say is Bricker is a real nasty drama queen and shows all the hallmarks of someone who has completely warped what the sherrif said to pimp herself.