What needs to be refuted are his allegations.
He's attacking the integrity of the premises for such conclusion as necessarily follows if the premises are true that has been bandied about in the conspiracy blogosphere.
Deal w/it.
He could be a $billion/month meth dealer. Those may be his credentials. Do those credentials detract from his refutation as presented?
He says there is kerning in other 1961 Hawaii birth certificates - I have seen it in the WH PDF - but in no others, he has to produce the picture.
He says that the other birth certificates have straight type on curved paper - but I have not seen him post it.
He says the layers are scanning/ocr artifacts - but that has been debunked, and if he wants to demonstrate his own support for that assertion - he is free to do so.
He says the type in the Obama LFCOLB is like all others - lets see him show the cloned elements such as the boxes on other birth certificate scans - I’ve seen it in the WH PDF.
He says Karl Denninger is nuts, but i have seen nothing about Karl’s color aberration analysis that shows editing - not scanning artifact.
Winston is smoking something, and is isn’t tobacco.
We’ve all seen the WH PDF anomalies carefully illustrated - he needs to show his side - not just make claims.